Primerjava: Petlas Imperium PT515 proti Falken e.Ziex proti Hankook ION Evo proti Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

1. Hankook ION Evo Premium

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

3. Falken e.Ziex Višji srednji razred

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 Nizkocenovno

1. Hankook ION Evo 64

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

3. Falken e.Ziex 34

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 11

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

2. Petlas Imperium PT515 5x

3. Falken e.Ziex 3x

4. Hankook ION Evo 1x

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

2. Hankook ION Evo 1.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 13.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 5.

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 35.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1

2. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 24

1. Falken e.Ziex 2025

2. Hankook ION Evo 2025

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 2021

1. Falken e.Ziex Zelo dobro

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zgledno

3. Hankook ION Evo Zgledno

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 Dobro

1. Falken e.Ziex Dobro

2. Petlas Imperium PT515 Zadovoljivo

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zadovoljivo

4. Hankook ION Evo ?

Hankook
ION Evo

89%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

57%

1. Hankook ION Evo 77%

2. Petlas Imperium PT515 71%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

4. Falken e.Ziex 68%

1. Hankook ION Evo 97%

2. Falken e.Ziex 87%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 72%

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 55%

1. Hankook ION Evo 87%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 66%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 89%

3. Falken e.Ziex 77%

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 60%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

3. Falken e.Ziex 69%

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 30%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

3. Falken e.Ziex ?

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 ?

Hankook
ION Evo

92%

Falken
e.Ziex

84%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

49%

1. Hankook ION Evo 91%

2. Falken e.Ziex 88%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 63%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Falken e.Ziex 81%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 30%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

83%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

78%

Hankook
ION Evo

66%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 70%

4. Hankook ION Evo 66%

1. Petlas Imperium PT515 90%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 90%

3. Falken e.Ziex 0%

4. Hankook ION Evo 0%

1. Petlas Imperium PT515 ?

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

3. Falken e.Ziex ?

4. Hankook ION Evo ?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Hankook
ION Evo

82%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

70%

Falken
e.Ziex

60%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 100%

2. Hankook ION Evo 82%

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 75%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 ?

4. Falken e.Ziex ?