Primerjava: Petlas Imperium PT515 proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 proti Falken e.Ziex proti Continental PremiumContact 7

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 Premium

3. Falken e.Ziex Višji srednji razred

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 Nizkocenovno

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 66

2. Falken e.Ziex 34

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 11

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 26x

2. Petlas Imperium PT515 5x

3. Falken e.Ziex 3x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3x

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 2.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 13.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 8.

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 35.

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 2.19

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.33

3. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 24

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 2026

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2026

3. Falken e.Ziex 2025

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 2021

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Zelo dobro

2. Falken e.Ziex Zelo dobro

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 Zmagovalec testa

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 Dobro

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 Dobro

2. Falken e.Ziex Dobro

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Priporočamo

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 Zadovoljivo

Continental
PremiumContact 7

79%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

57%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 75%

2. Petlas Imperium PT515 71%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 94%

2. Falken e.Ziex 87%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 55%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 76%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 66%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 92%

2. Falken e.Ziex 77%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 60%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 90%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

3. Falken e.Ziex 69%

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 30%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

3. Falken e.Ziex ?

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 ?

Falken
e.Ziex

84%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

78%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

49%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 90%

2. Falken e.Ziex 88%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 63%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 85%

2. Falken e.Ziex 81%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 30%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

78%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

74%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Petlas Imperium PT515 70%

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 69%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 88%

2. Petlas Imperium PT515 81%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 ?

2. Petlas Imperium PT515 ?

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

96%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

81%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

70%

Falken
e.Ziex

60%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 94%

2. Petlas Imperium PT515 65%

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 0%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 81%

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 75%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 C

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 ?

4. Falken e.Ziex ?