Primerjava: Firestone Roadhawk proti GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 proti Kumho Ecsta HS52 proti Falken e.Ziex

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Firestone Roadhawk Višji srednji razred

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Višji srednji razred

4. Falken e.Ziex Višji srednji razred

1. Firestone Roadhawk 161

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

3. Falken e.Ziex 34

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Firestone Roadhawk 21x

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

3. Falken e.Ziex 3x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

4. Firestone Roadhawk 31.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

2. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

4. Firestone Roadhawk 11.9

1. Falken e.Ziex 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2023

1. Falken e.Ziex Zelo dobro

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Zelo dobro

3. Firestone Roadhawk Zgledno

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Dobro

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Dobro

2. Falken e.Ziex Dobro

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Priporočamo

4. Firestone Roadhawk Pogojno priporočeno

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken
e.Ziex

73%

Firestone
Roadhawk

66%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 72%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 66%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 79%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 67%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 74%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

4. Falken e.Ziex 69%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 78%

3. Falken e.Ziex 77%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 100%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 92%

3. Falken e.Ziex 73%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. Firestone Roadhawk A

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

87%

Falken
e.Ziex

83%

Firestone
Roadhawk

81%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. Falken e.Ziex 88%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 83%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 88%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 85%

3. Falken e.Ziex 81%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 75%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 65%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Firestone
Roadhawk

70%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 62%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 77%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 72%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 59%

1. Falken e.Ziex ?

2. Firestone Roadhawk ?

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

82%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Firestone
Roadhawk

69%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 64%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 74%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 70%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 97%

2. Falken e.Ziex 60%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 61%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

3. Firestone Roadhawk C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?